Table of Contents
A thick fog crawls slowly over the narrow channels of water that crisscross the delta and an egret emerges from a mangrove and gently takes flight as the forest wakes up to another beautiful morning. Natives from the nearby villages take out their boats to venture into the forest in search of fish, crabs, honey and timber, fully aware that tigers lurk in its shadows.
This is the Sundarban – vibrant, mysterious, spectacular and, at times, dangerous.
This opening passage from "Landscape Narrative of the Sundarban: A Summary" by Bushra Nishat and Ganesh Pangare captures the essence of one of the world's most unique and vital ecosystems. For the first time, this narrative attempts to bridge a critical knowledge gap by presenting the Sundarban as a single, integrated landscape spanning both India and Bangladesh, rather than two separate administrative entities.
Why This Narrative Matters
Since the partition of 1947, the Sundarban – though geographically contiguous – has been administratively split between India and Bangladesh. This division has led to the region being viewed and managed as two separate ecosystems rather than one interconnected landscape. The consequences of this fragmented approach include:
· Duplication of management efforts
· Incomplete understanding of ecological processes
· Ineffective resource allocation
· Missed opportunities for collaborative conservation
· Limited ability to address transboundary challenges
This narrative, for the first time, tries to bridge the knowledge gap by collating data from both countries in order to facilitate the development of a collaborative action plan for the Sundarban region.
Definition of the Sundarban Region in This Narrative
The narrative defines the Sundarban region comprehensively as:
|
Component |
Country |
Description |
|
Sundarban Reserve Forest (SRF) |
Bangladesh |
The core mangrove forest area |
|
Ecologically Critical Area (ECA) |
Bangladesh |
10-km wide band surrounding SRF |
|
Sundarban Biosphere Reserve (SBR) |
India |
West Bengal, including inhabited areas |
This definition recognizes that the Sundarban represents not only the uninhabited mangrove forests but also the bordering areas that are home to people directly dependent on the forest for their lives and livelihood.
Objectives of the Landscape Narrative
The narrative was created with four primary objectives:
1. Create a multilayered and holistic understanding of the Sundarban to initiate planning activities that transcend political boundaries and multiple scales
2. Align and analyse information on ecological, socio-economic and cultural variables from different sources and records to support joint understanding
3. Synthesize current literature to identify effective management approaches and practices of the past
4. Identify gaps in learning, knowledge, data and information on the Sundarban
The Physical Landscape: A Dynamic, Ever-Changing Delta
Formation and Characteristics
The Sundarban spreads over an area of about 10,200 km² shared between India and Bangladesh. Most of the present-day Sundarban region was formed during the last 5,000 years by bio-tidal processes and marine and atmospheric agencies.
|
Characteristic |
Description |
|
Total Area |
~10,200 sq km (shared) |
|
Formation Period |
Last 5,000 years |
|
Water Coverage |
Approximately 30% |
|
Key Features |
Deltaic formations, water channels, salt marshes, tidal sandbars, islands |
|
Global Significance |
One of seven most globally important wetlands (WWF, 2017) |
The Role of Tides and Water Systems
The Sundarban landscape is dominated by deltaic formations that include a network of water channels where freshwater rivers and canals mix with tidal seawater channels. The tides play an important role in sculpting the physical features of the land, and the landscape keeps changing from high to low tide.
Key factors shaping the landscape:
· Tides and currents
· Sediment deposition
· Organic matter accumulation
· Erosion and accretion processes
· Freshwater inflow from Ganga distributaries
The River System
The rivers in the region are fed by the distributaries of the Ganga river system. The freshwater inflow from these rivers helps mitigate the salinity brought in by the tidal seawater of the Bay of Bengal. However, in recent decades:
· Salinity has been rising in the area
· Salinity is moving further inland
· Causes include man-made diversions and dams
· Sea level rise due to climate change exacerbates the problem
Vulnerability to Natural Hazards
The fragile ecosystem of the Sundarban and the communities living in and around it are vulnerable to:
|
Hazard |
Impact |
|
Tropical cyclones |
Loss of life and livelihood |
|
Storm surges |
Ecosystem damage, salinization |
|
Erosion |
Land loss, displacement |
|
Flood |
Crop damage, infrastructure destruction |
|
Drought |
Water scarcity, crop failure |
|
Frequent inundation |
Long-term ecosystem damage |
Important Note: Studies show that mangroves have the ability to cope with such hazards and, in most cases, recover from the impacts in due course (Spalding et.al. 2014).
The Biological Landscape: Extraordinary Biodiversity
Mangrove Vegetation
Mangroves thrive in tropical estuarine regions where mud-rich land meets sea. Their specialized root systems help them survive high water stress and fluctuations in temperature and salinity. The delicate balance of fresh water and seawater in the Sundarban has helped create a unique ecosystem suitable for mangroves.
Key Mangrove Species:
|
Local Name |
Scientific Name |
Status |
|
Sundari |
Heritiera fomes |
Dominant, but declining |
|
Gewa |
Excoecaria agallocha |
Common |
|
Goran |
Ceriops decandra |
Common |
|
Keora |
Sonneratia apetala |
Pioneer species |
Historical vs. Current Plant Diversity
|
Period |
Species Recorded |
Source |
|
1903 |
334 species |
Sir David Prain |
|
Present |
Declining |
Recent studies |
Three distinct vegetation types have been documented in relation to varying degrees of water salinity and freshwater flow. The pattern of vegetation succession depends on freshwater rivers that deposit silt, build land, and determine salinity levels.
Impact of Increasing Salinity
Increasing salinity in the region is bringing about changes in vegetation:
· Trees like the tall sundari mangrove and golpata/nipa palm, abundant fifty years ago, are now on the decline (Islam et al., 2014)
· Species combination and regular succession patterns are affected
· Dwarf species are gradually replacing taller trees
· The full impact on wildlife has not been assessed
Wildlife Diversity
The diverse array of plants, invertebrates and types of habitat in the Sundarban support abundant wildlife, both terrestrial and aquatic. The wildlife has adapted to the freshwater and saline-water environment and the ebb and flow of tides.
Invertebrate Life:
The wetlands sustain billions of:
· Protozoans
· Cnidarians
· Barnacles (Amphibalanus spp.)
· Oysters (Crassostrea spp.)
· Lichen and other invertebrates
These organisms support juvenile fish, crabs, prawns, shrimps and molluscs, which seek refuge in the shallow intertidal reaches that characterize the mangrove wetlands.
Vertebrate Wildlife:
|
Class |
Number of Species |
Notable Examples |
|
Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds, Mammals |
447 species |
Gangetic dolphin, Irrawaddy dolphin, olive ridley turtles |
The Bengal Tiger:
Importantly, the Sundarban is one of the few places in the world where the Bengal tigers still live in the wild. The tigers are vulnerable to poaching and revenge killing. In the villages around the Sundarban, prevention or resolution of tiger-human conflicts is a major part of tiger conservation efforts.
The Socio-Economic Landscape: People and Livelihoods
Population Dependence
Around 7.5 million people are directly dependent on the Sundarban:
|
Country |
Population Dependent |
Details |
|
India (West Bengal) |
~5 million |
Live in buffer zone of Sundarban Biosphere Reserve |
|
Bangladesh |
~2.5 million |
Reside within 20 km radius of Sundarban periphery |
This constitutes nearly 0.1 per cent of the global population dependent on a single ecosystem.
Livelihood Activities
With the moratorium on harvesting of timber in both countries, the most common ways of earning a living include:
Traditional Livelihoods:
· Fishing (jaleys in Bangladesh)
· Crab collection
· Honey and beeswax collection (mouals in Bangladesh)
· Woodcutting (bawalis in Bangladesh)
· Shrimp fry collection
· Nipa-leaf and thatching-grass collection
· Agriculture (limited due to salinity)
Emerging Livelihoods:
· Tourism
· Brackish water shrimp farming
Employment Figures
|
Country |
Employment |
Details |
|
Bangladesh |
350,000+ |
Fishermen, woodcutters, honey gatherers, collectors |
|
India |
~2 million |
Fishing, crab collection, honey collection, allied activities |
Population Trends
|
Region |
Trend |
Reasons |
|
Sundarban Biosphere Reserve (India) |
Steady increase |
- |
|
Areas around SRF (Bangladesh) |
Decrease |
Out-migration due to natural hazards, environmental degradation, water scarcity, limited infrastructure |
Poverty Profile
The people of the Sundarban are amongst the poorest in the region and face similar poverty-related issues on both sides of the border:
|
Indicator |
Indian Part |
Bangladesh Part |
|
Average per capita income |
~USD 0.5 per day |
~USD 0.9 per day |
|
Health conditions |
Poor |
Poor |
|
Education levels |
Relatively low |
Relatively low |
|
Employment opportunities |
Limited |
Limited |
|
Infrastructure |
Inadequate |
Inadequate |
|
Hazard risk |
Very high |
Very high |
Common challenges:
· Poor health conditions
· Low education levels
· Limited employment opportunities
· Inadequate infrastructure
· Very high risk of cyclones, floods, embankment failures
· Drinking water scarcity due to increased salinity
Traditional Conservation Ethos
Living in close contact with raw nature, the people of the Sundarban region have great respect for it. Their traditional practices, religious beliefs, rituals, folklore and arts and crafts promote conservation and living in harmony with nature.
Management and Conservation Practices: Historical Context
Colonial Era Management
|
Year |
Event |
|
1862 |
First call to preserve the forests (Choudhury and Ahmed, 1994) |
|
1875–76 |
Parts of Sundarban declared as reserved forest under Forest Act (1855) |
|
- |
Resource exploitation brought under government control with permit system |
|
1931 |
Curtis Plan came into force based on detailed scientific inventory |
Significance of Curtis Plan:
The Curtis Plan (1931) remains the last coordinated assessment of the entire Sundarban as one forest. Thereafter, relevant laws, policies and management plans have focused only on their respective sides of the forest.
Current Management Framework
Bangladesh:
|
Aspect |
Details |
|
Managed by |
Forest Department |
|
Primary focus |
Conservation of biodiversity |
|
ECA declaration |
10-km wide band around SRF declared Ecologically Critical Area under Environmental Conservation Act, 1995 |
|
ECA objective |
Protection to SRF and conservation of biodiversity |
|
ECA status |
No real initiative taken so far beyond few uncoordinated activities |
India:
|
Aspect |
Details |
|
Degree of protection |
Varies greatly across SBR |
|
Project Tiger |
Federally managed |
|
National Park & Sanctuaries |
Under West Bengal Forest Department |
|
Coordination challenge |
Numerous governmental organizations with overlapping authorities |
Issues and Shared Challenges
Despite national and international concern, political support and significant resource flows, a combination of factors has led to inadequate management and continuous degradation:
Common Challenges
|
Challenge |
Description |
|
Disaster exposure |
Cyclones, floods, storm surges |
|
Natural stresses |
Salinity increase, erosion |
|
Population pressure |
Growing demand on resources |
|
Commercialization |
Unregulated drives towards commercialization of natural products |
|
Institutional coordination |
Insufficient coordination and capacity |
|
Political boundaries |
Impact effectiveness in dealing with transboundary issues |
Active Delta Management Challenge
The Sundarban is an active delta region and numerous islands are still being formed and reformed by natural processes. While mangroves help in soil conservation, sea level rise and tidal hydraulics have caused erosion in many islands. This dynamic reality needs to be included in planning and management.
Climate Change Vulnerability
Both countries are vulnerable to:
· Cyclones
· Fluctuations in water salinity
· Flooding
· Sea level rise affecting agriculture
· Devastating impacts on fragile ecosystem
Policy Fragmentation
The management policies in both countries reflect their individual priorities, and political borders create the perception that the two sides of the Sundarban are two separate regions.
Data Collection Gaps
Three types of data are crucially required:
|
Data Type |
Current Status |
|
Forest inventory |
Periodic collection but no coordinated approach |
|
Wildlife census and survey |
Periodic collection but no coordinated approach |
|
Hydro-meteorological data |
Periodic collection but no coordinated approach |
Critical Gap: After 1930, there has been no attempt to scientifically assess the Sundarban as a whole.
Non-governmental actors (researchers, scientists, journalists) add to the information database through their studies, but their efforts are temporary and limited.
Emerging Opportunities for Coordinated and Concurrent Activities
Existing Bilateral Agreements
In 2011, India and Bangladesh signed:
1. Memorandum of Understanding for bilateral cooperation on conservation of the Sundarban
2. Protocol on the protection of tigers
Proposed strategic actions under these agreements:
· Joint research and monitoring
· Sharing of relevant information and technical knowledge (e.g., on tiger–human conflict)
· Execution of patrolling along borders to prevent poaching and illegal trade
Areas for Enhanced Cooperation
1. Natural Resources Management
|
Opportunity |
Description |
|
Restoration programmes |
Collaborative restoration and recovery |
|
Full value recognition |
Better recognition of forest values to increase profitability |
|
Human-wildlife conflict |
Joint strategies for prevention and resolution |
|
Community forestry |
Integrated package ensuring social interests and sustainable management |
|
Data sharing |
Sharing relevant data on plant and animal life |
|
Technology role |
Using technology to enhance knowledge base |
|
Cultural exchanges |
Improving bilateral relations, attracting new ideas |
2. Disaster Management
· Technical cooperation
· Capacity development
· Development of regional mechanisms
· Early warning systems
3. Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction
|
Opportunity |
Description |
|
Green economy |
Boosting economic growth while meeting conservation goals |
|
Public services strengthening |
Joint planning with unifying agenda |
|
Exchange of experiences |
Learning from each other's successes and failures |
4. Fisheries and Aquaculture
· Joint fish stock assessment
· Helping local fishermen improve productivity and profitability
· Identifying more fish sanctuaries
· Fostering backyard hatcheries to reduce dependence on wild shrimp fry
5. Marine Resource Conservation
· Ocean research collaboration
· Marine protected areas
· Integrating mangroves conservation in marine resources conservation
· Joint courses and curriculum development
· Applied/advanced research (marine bio-technology, marine fertilization, habitat modelling)
6. Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation
|
Activity |
Description |
|
Medium and long-range planning |
Incorporating climate change and variability |
|
Regional REDD+ guidelines |
Clear and integrated guidelines for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation |
|
Community forestry |
Integrating with climate goals |
|
Carbon sink research |
Studying capacity of mangroves to act as carbon sinks |
The Way Forward: Making Collaborative Action Workable
The Fundamental Challenge
While it is obvious that the Sundarban has to be considered as one ecosystem, the issue really is how to make collaborative action workable.
Complexities to address:
|
Factor |
Implication |
|
Separate countries |
Involvement and clearance from respective governments required |
|
State government involvement |
West Bengal government directly concerned, crucial to involve |
|
Different policies |
Governance policies and problems differ on two sides |
|
Multiple scales |
Need institutions at multiple levels |
Essential Elements for Success
1. Regional Platforms
Regional platforms need to be established and developed to work alongside other regional platforms across sectors and with the drivers of change in different rivers and basins.
2. Joint Bodies
In recent years, several joint bodies have been set up by the governments of India and Bangladesh for the protection of the Sundarban. However, the current level of cooperation is not enough to keep up with the dynamics of climate change and emerging socio-economic needs.
3. Consensus Building
Consensus building in joint ecology management and conservation efforts starts with:
· National interests (including economic development, security)
· Concerns and needs of local population
· Trust and political will
· Platforms for dialogue and transparency
· Knowledge and information
· Capacity and tools for integration
· Identification of mutual benefits
4. Effective Institutions
Successful management of the Sundarban will require crafting of effective institutions at multiple levels in order to provide incentives and disincentives.
Critical requirements:
· Institutions need to be truly representative
· Processes that support interaction with stakeholders must be included
· Agreements will work on the ground only if they involve stakeholders and have their support
· Must take into account local politics
5. Integration with National and International Agendas
In order to catalyse and mobilize regional platforms, it is necessary to include them in national agendas and international dialogues.
Conclusion: A Shared Vision for the Sundarban
The Sundarban, with its 10,200 square kilometers of mangrove forest, 7.5 million dependent people, extraordinary biodiversity, and global significance as a UNESCO World Heritage Site and Ramsar Wetland of International Importance, represents one of the most important conservation challenges and opportunities in South Asia.
This landscape narrative, for the first time, presents a holistic view of the Sundarban as one integrated ecosystem rather than two separate administrative entities. By collating data from both India and Bangladesh, it reveals:
· The interconnectedness of ecological processes that transcend political boundaries
· The shared challenges of poverty, vulnerability, and resource degradation facing communities on both sides
· The common heritage of traditional conservation practices and cultural values
· The gaps in knowledge and management that result from fragmented approaches
· The enormous potential for bilateral cooperation to achieve what neither country can accomplish alone
As climate change accelerates, sea levels rise, and pressures on natural resources intensify, the need for collaborative action becomes not just desirable but essential. The multiple treaties signed between India and Bangladesh, the existing joint bodies, and the growing recognition of shared interests provide a foundation upon which to build.
The way forward requires:
1. Political will at the highest levels
2. Inclusive institutions that represent all stakeholders
3. Integrated data and shared knowledge
4. Joint planning that transcends borders
5. Community involvement at every stage
6. Sustainable financing that recognizes the full value of the ecosystem
7. Adaptive management that responds to changing conditions
The Sundarban has survived for millennia through natural processes of adaptation and renewal. Today, it needs human cooperation to continue thriving. This landscape narrative offers a roadmap for that cooperation – a vision of two nations working together to protect one of the world's greatest natural treasures.
As the fog lifts on another morning in the Sundarban, revealing the intricate dance of water, forest, and life, the question is not whether India and Bangladesh should cooperate, but how quickly they can move from narrative to action.
Key Takeaways: Sundarban Landscape Narrative
|
Aspect |
Key Finding |
|
Total Area |
~10,200 sq km shared between India and Bangladesh |
|
Population Dependent |
~7.5 million (5 million India, 2.5 million Bangladesh) |
|
Global Significance |
World Heritage Site, Ramsar Wetland, one of 7 most important wetlands globally |
|
Biodiversity |
334 plant species (1903, now declining), 447 vertebrate species |
|
Last Coordinated Assessment |
1931 (Curtis Plan) |
|
Per Capita Income |
India: ~USD 0.5/day; Bangladesh: ~USD 0.9/day |
|
Primary Livelihoods |
Fishing, crab collection, honey collection, agriculture |
|
Major Threats |
Salinity increase, climate change, population pressure, institutional fragmentation |
|
Bilateral Agreements |
2011 MoU on conservation, Protocol on tiger protection |
|
Key Opportunity |
Collaborative management as one ecosystem |
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!